| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <539EB018.2010009@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:51:36 +0200
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
micky <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Roger <rogerable@...ltek.com>,
"Wei WANG" <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: rtsx: add support for async request
On 16-06-14 10:42, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 6 June 2014 09:05, <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn> wrote:
>> From: Micky Ching <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
>>
>> Add support for non-blocking request, pre_req() runs dma_map_sg() and
>> post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg(). This patch can increase card read/write
>> speed, especially for high speed card and slow speed CPU.
Interesting statement about slow speed CPU, but why then test with CPU
running at 2.3GHz. Did you also run at 800MHz?
Regards,
Arend
>> Test on intel i3(800MHz - 2.3GHz) performance mode(2.3GHz), SD card
>> clock 208MHz
>>
>> run dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1024
>> before:
>> 67108864 bytes (67 MB) copied, 0.85427 s, 78.6 MB/s
>> after:
>> 67108864 bytes (67 MB) copied, 0.74799 s, 89.7 MB/s
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Micky Ching <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
>> index 1c68e0d..a2c0858 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>> #include <linux/highmem.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/sd.h>
>> @@ -36,7 +37,10 @@ struct realtek_pci_sdmmc {
>> struct rtsx_pcr *pcr;
>> struct mmc_host *mmc;
>> struct mmc_request *mrq;
>> + struct workqueue_struct *workq;
>> +#define SDMMC_WORKQ_NAME "rtsx_pci_sdmmc_workq"
>>
>> + struct work_struct work;
>
> I am trying to understand why you need a work/workqueue to implement
> this feature. Is that really the case?
>
> Could you elaborate on the reasons?
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> struct mutex host_mutex;
>>
>> u8 ssc_depth;
>> @@ -48,6 +52,11 @@ struct realtek_pci_sdmmc {
>> int power_state;
>> #define SDMMC_POWER_ON 1
>> #define SDMMC_POWER_OFF 0
>> +
>> + unsigned int sg_count;
>> + s32 cookie;
>> + unsigned int cookie_sg_count;
>> + bool using_cookie;
>> };
>>
>> static inline struct device *sdmmc_dev(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host)
>> @@ -86,6 +95,77 @@ static void sd_print_debug_regs(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host)
>> #define sd_print_debug_regs(host)
>> #endif /* DEBUG */
>>
>> +/*
>> + * sd_pre_dma_transfer - do dma_map_sg() or using cookie
>> + *
>> + * @pre: if called in pre_req()
>> + * return:
>> + * 0 - do dma_map_sg()
>> + * 1 - using cookie
>> + */
>> +static int sd_pre_dma_transfer(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host,
>> + struct mmc_data *data, bool pre)
>> +{
>> + struct rtsx_pcr *pcr = host->pcr;
>> + int read = data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ;
>> + int count = 0;
>> + int using_cookie = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!pre && data->host_cookie && data->host_cookie != host->cookie) {
>> + dev_err(sdmmc_dev(host),
>> + "error: data->host_cookie = %d, host->cookie = %d\n",
>> + data->host_cookie, host->cookie);
>> + data->host_cookie = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pre || data->host_cookie != host->cookie) {
>> + count = rtsx_pci_dma_map_sg(pcr, data->sg, data->sg_len, read);
>> + } else {
>> + count = host->cookie_sg_count;
>> + using_cookie = 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pre) {
>> + host->cookie_sg_count = count;
>> + if (++host->cookie < 0)
>> + host->cookie = 1;
>> + data->host_cookie = host->cookie;
>> + } else {
>> + host->sg_count = count;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return using_cookie;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sdmmc_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq,
>> + bool is_first_req)
>> +{
>> + struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> + struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
>> +
>> + if (data->host_cookie) {
>> + dev_err(sdmmc_dev(host),
>> + "error: reset data->host_cookie = %d\n",
>> + data->host_cookie);
>> + data->host_cookie = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sd_pre_dma_transfer(host, data, true);
>> + dev_dbg(sdmmc_dev(host), "pre dma sg: %d\n", host->cookie_sg_count);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sdmmc_post_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq,
>> + int err)
>> +{
>> + struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> + struct rtsx_pcr *pcr = host->pcr;
>> + struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
>> + int read = data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ;
>> +
>> + rtsx_pci_dma_unmap_sg(pcr, data->sg, data->sg_len, read);
>> + data->host_cookie = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int sd_read_data(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host, u8 *cmd, u16 byte_cnt,
>> u8 *buf, int buf_len, int timeout)
>> {
>> @@ -415,7 +495,7 @@ static int sd_rw_multi(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>>
>> rtsx_pci_send_cmd_no_wait(pcr);
>>
>> - err = rtsx_pci_transfer_data(pcr, data->sg, data->sg_len, read, 10000);
>> + err = rtsx_pci_dma_transfer(pcr, data->sg, host->sg_count, read, 10000);
>> if (err < 0) {
>> sd_clear_error(host);
>> return err;
>> @@ -640,12 +720,24 @@ static int sd_tuning_rx(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host, u8 opcode)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void sdmmc_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> +static inline int sd_rw_cmd(struct mmc_command *cmd)
>> {
>> - struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> + return mmc_op_multi(cmd->opcode) ||
>> + (cmd->opcode == MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK) ||
>> + (cmd->opcode == MMC_WRITE_BLOCK);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sd_request(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host = container_of(work,
>> + struct realtek_pci_sdmmc, work);
>> struct rtsx_pcr *pcr = host->pcr;
>> +
>> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
>> + struct mmc_request *mrq = host->mrq;
>> struct mmc_command *cmd = mrq->cmd;
>> struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
>> +
>> unsigned int data_size = 0;
>> int err;
>>
>> @@ -677,13 +769,13 @@ static void sdmmc_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> if (mrq->data)
>> data_size = data->blocks * data->blksz;
>>
>> - if (!data_size || mmc_op_multi(cmd->opcode) ||
>> - (cmd->opcode == MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK) ||
>> - (cmd->opcode == MMC_WRITE_BLOCK)) {
>> + if (!data_size || sd_rw_cmd(cmd)) {
>> sd_send_cmd_get_rsp(host, cmd);
>>
>> if (!cmd->error && data_size) {
>> sd_rw_multi(host, mrq);
>> + if (!host->using_cookie)
>> + sdmmc_post_req(host->mmc, host->mrq, 0);
>>
>> if (mmc_op_multi(cmd->opcode) && mrq->stop)
>> sd_send_cmd_get_rsp(host, mrq->stop);
>> @@ -712,6 +804,21 @@ finish:
>> mmc_request_done(mmc, mrq);
>> }
>>
>> +static void sdmmc_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>> +{
>> + struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> + struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&host->host_mutex);
>> + host->mrq = mrq;
>> + mutex_unlock(&host->host_mutex);
>> +
>> + if (sd_rw_cmd(mrq->cmd))
>> + host->using_cookie = sd_pre_dma_transfer(host, data, false);
>> +
>> + queue_work(host->workq, &host->work);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int sd_set_bus_width(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host,
>> unsigned char bus_width)
>> {
>> @@ -1144,6 +1251,8 @@ out:
>> }
>>
>> static const struct mmc_host_ops realtek_pci_sdmmc_ops = {
>> + .pre_req = sdmmc_pre_req,
>> + .post_req = sdmmc_post_req,
>> .request = sdmmc_request,
>> .set_ios = sdmmc_set_ios,
>> .get_ro = sdmmc_get_ro,
>> @@ -1222,10 +1331,16 @@ static int rtsx_pci_sdmmc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> + host->workq = create_singlethread_workqueue(SDMMC_WORKQ_NAME);
>> + if (!host->workq) {
>> + mmc_free_host(mmc);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> host->pcr = pcr;
>> host->mmc = mmc;
>> host->pdev = pdev;
>> host->power_state = SDMMC_POWER_OFF;
>> + INIT_WORK(&host->work, sd_request);
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, host);
>> pcr->slots[RTSX_SD_CARD].p_dev = pdev;
>> pcr->slots[RTSX_SD_CARD].card_event = rtsx_pci_sdmmc_card_event;
>> @@ -1253,6 +1368,8 @@ static int rtsx_pci_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> pcr->slots[RTSX_SD_CARD].card_event = NULL;
>> mmc = host->mmc;
>>
>> + cancel_work_sync(&host->work);
>> +
>> mutex_lock(&host->host_mutex);
>> if (host->mrq) {
>> dev_dbg(&(pdev->dev),
>> @@ -1271,6 +1388,10 @@ static int rtsx_pci_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> mmc_remove_host(mmc);
>> host->eject = true;
>>
>> + flush_workqueue(host->workq);
>> + destroy_workqueue(host->workq);
>> + host->workq = NULL;
>> +
>> mmc_free_host(mmc);
>>
>> dev_dbg(&(pdev->dev),
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists