[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140616130306.GU14323@lee--X1>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:03:06 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: sbkim73@...sung.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
k.kozlowski@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] mfd: sec-core: Add support for S2MPU02 device
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Add support for Samsung S2MPU02 PMIC device to the MFD sec-core driver.
> The S2MPU02 device includes PMIC/RTC/Clock devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 19 +++++++++
> drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 +
> include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h | 24 +++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> index be06d0a..5e8784b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "s2mpu02-pmic",
> + }, {
> + .name = "s2mpu02-rtc",
Make these two one liners, so:
{ .name = "s2mpu02-pmic" },
{ .name = "s2mpu02-rtc" ),
> + }, {
> + .name = "s2mpu02-clk",
> + .of_compatible = "samsung,s2mpu02-clk",
> + }
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-pmic",
> @@ -103,6 +114,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
> .compatible = "samsung,s2mpa01-pmic",
> .data = (void *)S2MPA01,
> }, {
> + .compatible = "samsung,s2mpu02-pmic",
> + .data = (void *)S2MPU02,
> + }, {
> /* Sentinel */
> },
> };
> @@ -342,6 +356,11 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, s2mps14_devs,
> ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> break;
> + case S2MPU02:
> + ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, s2mpu02_devs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> + break;
This is a bit bonkers. Instead of passing S2MPU02, why don't you pass
a new container which holds s2mpu02_devs and s2mpu02_irq_chip, then
you won't need new mfd_add_devices() and regmap_add_irq_chip() calls
for every device you want to support.
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists