[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <539F096F.8020502@linux.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:12:47 +0200
From: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>, swise@...lsio.com
CC: roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3]Checks for Null value in function *get_skub
On 06/16/2014 05:08 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
> index f9477e2..2d56983 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
> @@ -340,15 +340,13 @@ static int status2errno(int status)
> */
> static struct sk_buff *get_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int len, gfp_t gfp)
> {
> if (skb && !skb_is_nonlinear(skb) && !skb_cloned(skb)) {
> skb_trim(skb, 0);
> skb_get(skb);
> skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
> } else {
> + if (skb)
> + kfree (skb);
> skb = alloc_skb(len, gfp);
> }
> t4_set_arp_err_handler(skb, NULL, NULL);
>
Isn't kfree(NULL) legal?
(i.e. the if statement is useless)
Thanks,
Levente Kurusa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists