[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <539F1D36.5040008@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:37:10 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xenpv: don't BUG when failing to setup
NMI callback
On 16/06/14 12:07, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -746,12 +746,13 @@ static int cvt_gate_to_trap(int vector, const gate_desc *val,
> */
> ;
> #endif
> - } else if (addr == (unsigned long)nmi)
> + } else if (addr == (unsigned long)nmi) {
> /*
> - * Use the native version as well.
> + * Use the native version as well but require Xen >= 3.2
> */
> - ;
> - else {
> + if (!xen_running_on_version_or_later(3, 2))
> + return 0;
> + } else {
The end result of this looked odd so I played around with it a bit and
it turns out that the register_callback for the NMI is entirely unneeded
(since we set the NMI callback via the write_idt pv-op and it's also
broken since it only sets the callback on the current VCPU.
I'm preparing an alternate patch, but I do not have a Xen 3.1 install I
can test with.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists