linux-kernel - Re: 3.15: kernel BUG at kernel/auditsc.c:1525!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <539F2B2D.6050105@gmx.de>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:36:45 +0200
From:	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.15: kernel BUG at kernel/auditsc.c:1525!

On 06/16/2014 07:32 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>> Am 16.06.2014 19:25, schrieb Andy Lutomirski:
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Richard Weinberger
>>> <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de> wrote:
>>>>> $ cat syscall.c
>>>>> #include <unistd.h>
>>>>> #include <sys/syscall.h>
>>>>> int main(){return syscall(1000)!=-1;}
>>>
>>> What architecture are you building for?  On i386 and x86_64, 1000
>>> shouldn't be big enough to trigger this.
>>
>> Toralf, is this an UML kernel?
>>
> 
> I'm also interested in the userspace architecture.  If it's x32
> userspace, then I'm not surprised that there's a problem.

It is a x86 system (ThinkPad T420) - not x32.


-- 
Toralf

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/