lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:06:26 +0200
From:	Mateusz Guzik <>
To:	Nicholas Krause <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for Null return from logfs_readpage_nolock in

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:47:01PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <>
> ---
>  fs/logfs/readwrite.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/fs/logfs/readwrite.c b/fs/logfs/readwrite.c
> index 4814031..adb9233 100644
> --- a/fs/logfs/readwrite.c
> +++ b/fs/logfs/readwrite.c
> @@ -2210,6 +2210,8 @@ void btree_write_block(struct logfs_block *block)
>  	page = logfs_get_write_page(inode, block->bix, block->level);
>  	err = logfs_readpage_nolock(page);
> +	if (!err)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	BUG_ON(err);
>  	BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page));
>  	BUG_ON(logfs_block(page) != block);

This function returns 0 on success, which you turn into error condition
and return -ENOMEM.
But the function returns void, thus it cannot return the error.
It does not allocate anything, thus -ENOMEM would not be appropriate in
the first place.

Since the function returns error, nobody would check the condition in
the first place.

Even if it was not void, it would either have to return the error or
oops on BUG_ON(err).

Read the code more carefully and at least compile-test your changes.
Instructions how to compile the kernel can be found here:

I would also suggest letting the patch wait few hours and have another
look before sending.

Mateusz Guzik
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists