[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140616052325.GC23210@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:23:25 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] DMA, CMA: support arbitrary bitmap granularity
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:19:54PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:
> > ppc kvm's cma region management requires arbitrary bitmap granularity,
> > since they want to reserve very large memory and manage this region
> > with bitmap that one bit for several pages to reduce management overheads.
> > So support arbitrary bitmap granularity for following generalization.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> > index bc4c171..9bc9340 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct cma {
> > unsigned long base_pfn;
> > unsigned long count;
>
> Have you considered replacing count with maxno?
No, I haven't.
I think that count is better than maxno, since it represent number of
pages in this region.
>
> > unsigned long *bitmap;
> > + int order_per_bit; /* Order of pages represented by one bit */
>
> I'd make it unsigned.
Will fix it.
> > struct mutex lock;
> > };
> >
> > +static void clear_cma_bitmap(struct cma *cma, unsigned long pfn, int
> > count)
>
> For consistency cma_clear_bitmap would make more sense I think. On the
> other hand, you're just moving stuff around so perhaps renaming the
> function at this point is not worth it any more.
Will fix it.
> > +{
> > + unsigned long bitmapno, nr_bits;
> > +
> > + bitmapno = (pfn - cma->base_pfn) >> cma->order_per_bit;
> > + nr_bits = cma_bitmap_pages_to_bits(cma, count);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&cma->lock);
> > + bitmap_clear(cma->bitmap, bitmapno, nr_bits);
> > + mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init cma_activate_area(struct cma *cma)
> > {
> > - int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(cma->count) * sizeof(long);
> > + int bitmap_maxno = cma_bitmap_maxno(cma);
> > + int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(bitmap_maxno) * sizeof(long);
> > unsigned long base_pfn = cma->base_pfn, pfn = base_pfn;
> > unsigned i = cma->count >> pageblock_order;
> > struct zone *zone;
>
> bitmap_maxno is never used again, perhaps:
>
> + int bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(cma_bitmap_maxno(cma)) * sizeof(long);
>
> instead? Up to you.
Okay!!
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists