[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1403041506-13646-213-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:45:06 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 212/212] mm: add !pte_present() check on existing hugetlb_entry callbacks
3.13.11.4 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
commit d4c54919ed86302094c0ca7d48a8cbd4ee753e92 upstream.
The age table walker doesn't check non-present hugetlb entry in common
path, so hugetlb_entry() callbacks must check it. The reason for this
behavior is that some callers want to handle it in its own way.
[ I think that reason is bogus, btw - it should just do what the regular
code does, which is to call the "pte_hole()" function for such hugetlb
entries - Linus]
However, some callers don't check it now, which causes unpredictable
result, for example when we have a race between migrating hugepage and
reading /proc/pid/numa_maps. This patch fixes it by adding !pte_present
checks on buggy callbacks.
This bug exists for years and got visible by introducing hugepage
migration.
ChangeLog v2:
- fix if condition (check !pte_present() instead of pte_present())
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
[ Backported to 3.15. Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +-
mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index fb52b54..8f78819 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ static int gather_hugetbl_stats(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
struct numa_maps *md;
struct page *page;
- if (pte_none(*pte))
+ if (!pte_present(*pte))
return 0;
page = pte_page(*pte);
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index cb2f3dd..e980746 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -526,9 +526,13 @@ static void queue_pages_hugetlb_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
int nid;
struct page *page;
spinlock_t *ptl;
+ pte_t entry;
ptl = huge_pte_lock(hstate_vma(vma), vma->vm_mm, (pte_t *)pmd);
- page = pte_page(huge_ptep_get((pte_t *)pmd));
+ entry = huge_ptep_get((pte_t *)pmd);
+ if (!pte_present(entry))
+ goto unlock;
+ page = pte_page(entry);
nid = page_to_nid(page);
if (node_isset(nid, *nodes) == !!(flags & MPOL_MF_INVERT))
goto unlock;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists