[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140617214709.GA30559@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:47:09 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, ben@...adent.org.uk,
gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Fix unaligned access testing AF transaction pending
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:28:07AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> pci_wait_for_pending() uses word access, so we shouldn't be passing
> an offset that is only byte aligned. Use the control register offset
> instead, shifting the mask to match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Applied with Gavin's ack to for-linus for v3.16, thanks!
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 759475e..81012ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -3109,8 +3109,13 @@ static int pci_af_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
> if (probe)
> return 0;
>
> - /* Wait for Transaction Pending bit clean */
> - if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_STATUS, PCI_AF_STATUS_TP))
> + /*
> + * Wait for Transaction Pending bit to clear. A word-aligned test
> + * is used, so we use the conrol offset rather than status and shift
> + * the test bit to match.
> + */
> + if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_CTRL,
> + PCI_AF_STATUS_TP << 8))
> goto clear;
>
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "transaction is not cleared; "
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists