linux-kernel - [PATCH v1] kexec:fs2dt: Refine kdump device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1402985176-10556-1-git-send-email-Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:06:16 +0800
From:	<Wei.Yang@...driver.com>
To:	<horms@...ge.net.au>
CC:	<wei.yang@...driver.com>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] kexec:fs2dt: Refine kdump device_tree sort

From: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@...driver.com>

The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of
serial node still is changed. We should not only compare the length
of directory name, but also compare the directory name, it would
ensure that the order of device node is really in ascending order.

Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@...driver.com>
---
 
Hi Simon,

   Please help me take a look at this patch. I validated it on freescale t4240qds.

   Thanks
   Wei
 kexec/fs2dt.c |   13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kexec/fs2dt.c b/kexec/fs2dt.c
index 1e5f074..0bffaf5 100644
--- a/kexec/fs2dt.c
+++ b/kexec/fs2dt.c
@@ -479,6 +479,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1,
 {
 	char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name;
 	char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name;
+	char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@');
+	char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@');
+	int len1, len2;
 
 	/*
 	 * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some
@@ -486,9 +489,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1,
 	 * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@...00000 and
 	 * memory@...0000.
 	 */
-	if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') &&
-		(strlen(str1) > strlen(str2)))
-		return 1;
+	if (ptr1 && ptr2) {
+		len1 = ptr1 - str1;
+		len2 = ptr2 - str2;
+		if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) &&
+					(strlen(str1) > strlen(str2)))
+				return 1;
+	}
 
 	return strcmp(str1, str2);
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/