[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140617113952.GE8539@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:39:52 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netconsole breaks netpoll on bridge
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:06:58AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Am 16.06.2014 23:30, schrieb Francois Romieu:
> > Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag> :
> > [...]
> >> That sounds great! Is there anything I can do or some code I can port to veth?
> >
> > You may add an empty handler for .ndo_poll_controller in drivers/net/veth.c
> > and give it a try on current kernel.
> >
> > It should not be too bad.
> >
> Why is an empty poll controller enough to fix it? This sounds a bit
> crazy to me.
>
Because the presence of a non-null poll_controller method is how we determine if
a device supports netpoll. Most devices require a ndo_poll_controller function
to simulate an interrupt for receiving packets, but virtual devices really
don't, so an empty function sufficies to get the device recognized as having
netpoll support. See tun_poll_controller as an example
Neil
>
> Greets,
> Stefan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists