[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53A0428C.10200@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:28:44 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: add get_user() support for 8 byte types
On 17/06/14 12:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> ... at this point there is a narrowing cast followed by an implicit
>> widening. This results in compiler either ignoring r3 altogether or, if
>> spilling to the stack, generating code to set r3 to zero before doing
>> the store.
>
> In actual fact, there's very little difference between the two
> implementations in terms of generated code.
>
> The difference between them is what happens on the 64-bit big endian
> narrowing case, where we use __get_user_4 with your version. This
> adds one additional instruction.
Good point.
> and 64-bit narrowed to 32-bit:
>
> str lr, [sp, #-4]!
> - mov ip, r0
> + mov r3, r0
> mov r0, r1
> #APP
> @ 275 "t-getuser.c" 1
> - bl __get_user_8
> + bl __get_user_4
> @ 0 "" 2
> - str r2, [ip, #0]
> + str r2, [r3, #0]
> ldr pc, [sp], #4
The later case avoids allocating r3 for the __get_user_x and should
reduce register pressure and, potentially, saves a few instructions
elsewhere (one of my rather large test functions does demonstrate this
effect).
I don't know if we care about that. If we do I'm certainly happy to put
a patch together than exploits this (whilst avoiding the add in the big
endian case).
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists