| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <53A0667E.6000905@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:02:06 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
To: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: kgene.kim@...sung.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
chow.kim@...sung.com, vikas.sajjan@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Refactored code for using PMU
address via DT
Hi Pankaj,
[Dropped yg1004.jang@...sung.com from CC, as apparently his mailbox is
"temporarily locked", at least from the point of view of my mail server.]
Please see my comments inline.
On 10.05.2014 08:56, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Under "arm/mach-exynos" many files are using PMU register offsets.
> Since we have added support for accessing PMU base address via DT,
> now we can remove PMU mapping from exynosX_iodesc. Let's convert
> all these access using either of iomapped address or regmap handle.
> This will help us in removing static mapping of PMU base address
> as well as help in reducing dependency over machine header files.
> Thus helping for migration of PMU implementation from machine to
> driver folder which can be reused for ARM64 bsed SoC.
[snip]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 3b1d245..59eb1f1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
[snip]
> @@ -156,7 +147,7 @@ static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> u32 val = 0x1;
> - void __iomem *addr = EXYNOS_SWRESET;
> + void __iomem *addr = NULL;
This will probably change into addr = exynos_pmu_base + EXYNOS_SWRESET.
>
> if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")) {
> u32 status;
> @@ -169,9 +160,9 @@ static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
> val = __raw_readl(addr);
>
> val = (val & 0xffff0000) | (status & 0xffff);
> - }
> -
> - __raw_writel(val, addr);
> + __raw_writel(val, addr);
> + } else
> + regmap_write(exynos_pmu_regmap, EXYNOS_SWRESET, val);
> }
>
> static struct platform_device exynos_cpuidle = {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> index 73b0b5c..0243ef3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/cp15.h>
> @@ -91,11 +92,12 @@ static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
>
> static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
> {
> + struct regmap *pmu_regmap = get_exynos_pmuregmap();
> for (;;) {
>
> /* make cpu1 to be turned off at next WFI command */
> if (cpu == 1)
> - __raw_writel(0, S5P_ARM_CORE1_CONFIGURATION);
> + regmap_write(pmu_regmap, S5P_ARM_CORE1_CONFIGURATION, 0);
This change should disappear.
[snip]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> index 1f63596..33eb364 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
[snip]
> +static void __iomem *pmu_base_addr(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = NULL;
> + if (!pmu_base) {
> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
> +
> + if (!np)
> + panic("%s, failed to find PMU node\n", __func__);
> +
> + pmu_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> +
> + if (!pmu_base)
> + panic("%s: failed to map registers\n", __func__);
> + }
> + return pmu_base;
> +}
As we discussed before, PMU mapping for arch code should be handled in
the same way as SYSRAM.
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(boot_lock);
>
> static void exynos_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -132,14 +158,14 @@ static int exynos_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
> */
> write_pen_release(phys_cpu);
>
> - if (!(__raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE1_STATUS) & S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN)) {
> + if (!(__raw_readl(pmu_base + S5P_ARM_CORE1_STATUS)
> + & S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN)) {
Creating a variable to save register value to would probably make the
code more readable.
> __raw_writel(S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN,
> - S5P_ARM_CORE1_CONFIGURATION);
> -
> + pmu_base + S5P_ARM_CORE1_CONFIGURATION);
> timeout = 10;
>
> /* wait max 10 ms until cpu1 is on */
> - while ((__raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE1_STATUS)
> + while ((__raw_readl(pmu_base + S5P_ARM_CORE1_STATUS)
> & S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) != S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) {
Ditto.
> if (timeout-- == 0)
> break;
> @@ -238,6 +264,8 @@ static void __init exynos_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> {
> int i;
>
> + pmu_base = pmu_base_addr();
> +
> if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9)
> scu_enable(scu_base_addr());
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> index f445c49..ee427d7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
> @@ -38,6 +39,8 @@
> #include "regs-pmu.h"
> #include "regs-sys.h"
>
> +static struct regmap *pmu_regmap;
> +
This and other regmap related changes in this file won't be needed anymore.
> /**
> * struct exynos_wkup_irq - Exynos GIC to PMU IRQ mapping
> * @hwirq: Hardware IRQ signal of the GIC
> @@ -104,10 +107,10 @@ static int exynos_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int state)
[snip]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
> index fd8a19d..a72b1bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
[snip]
>
> -#define S5P_WAKEUP_STAT S5P_PMUREG(0x0600)
> -#define S5P_EINT_WAKEUP_MASK S5P_PMUREG(0x0604)
> -#define S5P_WAKEUP_MASK S5P_PMUREG(0x0608)
> +#define S5P_WAKEUP_STAT 0x0600
> +#define S5P_EINT_WAKEUP_MASK 0x0604
> +#define S5P_WAKEUP_MASK 0x0608
Is it just my mail client or indentation is inconsistent here?
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists