linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] percpu: add data dependency barrier in percpu accessors and operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140617160508.GF31819@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:05:08 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] percpu: add data dependency barrier in percpu
 accessors and operations

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:00:40PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Christoph.
> 
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:56:10AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Uhhh no. The percpu stuff and the associated per cpu atomics are to be
> > used for stuff that is per cpu specific and runs at the fastest speed
> > doable at that level. Introducing implicit barriers is not that good an
> > idea.
> 
> Hmmm?  Read barriers are noops on all archs except for alpha and

Oops, data dependency barriers, not read barrier.

> percpu pointer assignments aren't exactly a high frequency operation
> and I'm pretty sure we'll end up with a raw variant anyway.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/