| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:27:47 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 03/12] mm: huge_memory: use GFP_TRANSHUGE when charging
huge pages
On Tue 17-06-14 11:38:14, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:23:17PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -2647,7 +2645,7 @@ retry:
> > if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> > goto bypass;
> >
> > - if (!oom)
> > + if (!oom_gfp_allowed(gfp_mask))
> > goto nomem;
>
> We don't actually need that check: if __GFP_NORETRY is set, we goto
> nomem directly after reclaim fails and don't even reach here.
I meant it for further robustness. If we ever change oom_gfp_allowed in
future and have new and unexpected users then we should back off. Or
maybe WARN_ON(!oom_gfp_allowed(gfp_mask)) would be more appropriate to
catch those and fix the charging code or the charger?
> So here is the patch I have now - can I get your sign-off on this?
Sure. Thanks!
> ---
> From eda800d2aa2376d347d6d4f7660e3450bd4c5dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:10:59 -0400
> Subject: [patch] mm: memcontrol: remove explicit OOM parameter in charge path
>
> For the page allocator, __GFP_NORETRY implies that no OOM should be
> triggered, whereas memcg has an explicit parameter to disable OOM.
>
> The only callsites that want OOM disabled are THP charges and charge
> moving. THP already uses __GFP_NORETRY and charge moving can use it
> as well - one full reclaim cycle should be plenty. Switch it over,
> then remove the OOM parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 32 ++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 9c646b9b56f4..c765125694e2 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2555,15 +2555,13 @@ static int memcg_cpu_hotplug_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> * mem_cgroup_try_charge - try charging a memcg
> * @memcg: memcg to charge
> * @nr_pages: number of pages to charge
> - * @oom: trigger OOM if reclaim fails
> *
> * Returns 0 if @memcg was charged successfully, -EINTR if the charge
> * was bypassed to root_mem_cgroup, and -ENOMEM if the charge failed.
> */
> static int mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - unsigned int nr_pages,
> - bool oom)
> + unsigned int nr_pages)
> {
> unsigned int batch = max(CHARGE_BATCH, nr_pages);
> int nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> @@ -2647,9 +2645,6 @@ retry:
> if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> goto bypass;
>
> - if (!oom)
> - goto nomem;
> -
> mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(batch));
> nomem:
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
> @@ -2675,15 +2670,14 @@ done:
> */
> static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - unsigned int nr_pages,
> - bool oom)
> + unsigned int nr_pages)
>
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> int ret;
>
> memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(mm);
> - ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(memcg, gfp_mask, nr_pages, oom);
> + ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(memcg, gfp_mask, nr_pages);
> css_put(&memcg->css);
> if (ret == -EINTR)
> memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
> @@ -2900,8 +2894,7 @@ static int memcg_charge_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, u64 size)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(memcg, gfp, size >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> - oom_gfp_allowed(gfp));
> + ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(memcg, gfp, size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> if (ret == -EINTR) {
> /*
> * mem_cgroup_try_charge() chosed to bypass to root due to
> @@ -3650,7 +3643,6 @@ int mem_cgroup_charge_anon(struct page *page,
> {
> unsigned int nr_pages = 1;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> - bool oom = true;
>
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return 0;
> @@ -3662,14 +3654,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_charge_anon(struct page *page,
> if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> nr_pages <<= compound_order(page);
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageTransHuge(page), page);
> - /*
> - * Never OOM-kill a process for a huge page. The
> - * fault handler will fall back to regular pages.
> - */
> - oom = false;
> }
>
> - memcg = mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(mm, gfp_mask, nr_pages, oom);
> + memcg = mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(mm, gfp_mask, nr_pages);
> if (!memcg)
> return -ENOMEM;
> __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(memcg, page, nr_pages,
> @@ -3706,7 +3693,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(struct mm_struct *mm,
> memcg = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page(page);
> if (!memcg)
> memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(mm);
> - ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(memcg, mask, 1, true);
> + ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(memcg, mask, 1);
> css_put(&memcg->css);
> if (ret == -EINTR)
> memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
> @@ -3733,7 +3720,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page *page,
> if (!PageSwapCache(page)) {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>
> - memcg = mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(mm, gfp_mask, 1, true);
> + memcg = mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(mm, gfp_mask, 1);
> if (!memcg)
> return -ENOMEM;
> *memcgp = memcg;
> @@ -3802,7 +3789,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_charge_file(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - memcg = mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(mm, gfp_mask, 1, true);
> + memcg = mem_cgroup_try_charge_mm(mm, gfp_mask, 1);
> if (!memcg)
> return -ENOMEM;
> __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(memcg, page, 1, type, false);
> @@ -6414,7 +6401,8 @@ one_by_one:
> batch_count = PRECHARGE_COUNT_AT_ONCE;
> cond_resched();
> }
> - ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, 1, false);
> + ret = mem_cgroup_try_charge(memcg,
> + GFP_KERNEL & ~__GFP_NORETRY, 1);
> if (ret)
> /* mem_cgroup_clear_mc() will do uncharge later */
> return ret;
> --
> 2.0.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists