[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403024089.1995.0.camel@jarvis>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:54:49 -0700
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, joro@...tes.org,
jejb@...isc-linux.org, deller@....de, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
clm@...com, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, swhiteho@...hat.com,
bharrosh@...asas.com, bhalevy@...marydata.com, ccaulfie@...hat.com,
teigland@...hat.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
cm224.lee@...sung.com, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] kobject: return actual error on
kset_create_and_add
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 11:29 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > What useful information does this supply? The current assumption on
> > NULL return is -ENOMEM ... what's the interesting case where this
> > assumption is wrong?
>
> No idea. Sysfs just ignored all error codes and returns NULL right now.
> If it is indeed just ENOMEN then we have no issue.
Well, I think when we have that justification, then we can decide on the
merits of the patch set.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists