[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1403026045-16024-6-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:27:21 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] thermal: exynos: remove redundant threshold_code checks
from exynos_tmu_initialize()
Remove runtime checks for negative return values of temp_to_code()
from exynos_tmu_initialize().
The current level temperature data hardcoded in pdata will never
cause a negative temp_to_code() return values and checking itself
is not proper. The checks in question are done at runtime in
a production code for data that is hardcoded inside driver during
development time and later it doesn't change. Such data should
be verified during development and review time (i.e. by a script
parsing relevant data from exynos_tmu_data.c, one can also argue
that verification to be done is so simple that the review by
a maintainer should be enough).
Theres should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
---
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 16 +---------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index f061580..204f811 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -180,10 +180,6 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
/* Write temperature code for threshold */
threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
- if (threshold_code < 0) {
- ret = threshold_code;
- goto out;
- }
writeb(threshold_code,
data->base + reg->threshold_temp);
for (i = 0; i < trigger_levs; i++)
@@ -197,19 +193,13 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
i < trigger_levs && i < EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG; i++) {
threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
pdata->trigger_levels[i]);
- if (threshold_code < 0) {
- ret = threshold_code;
- goto out;
- }
rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
pdata->trigger_levels[i] -
pdata->threshold_falling);
- if (threshold_code > 0)
- falling_threshold |=
- threshold_code << 8 * i;
+ falling_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
}
}
@@ -228,10 +218,6 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
(pdata->trigger_type[i] == HW_TRIP)) {
threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
pdata->trigger_levels[i]);
- if (threshold_code < 0) {
- ret = threshold_code;
- goto out;
- }
if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
/* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
--
1.8.2.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists