[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140617185510.GM4669@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:55:10 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] percpu: add data dependency barrier in percpu
accessors and operations
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:47:01PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Jun 17, 2014 6:28 AM, "Christoph Lameter" <cl@...two.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Even alpha maintains the illusion of changes becoming visible in the
> > > proper order for the currently executing thread. No barriers are needed.
> >
> > No Christoph, alpha really doesn't. Barriers needed.
>
> Everythig breaks if a single hardware execution thread can no longer
> observe a consistent view of the world of the data it modifies.
>
> We are not talking about synchronization here between multiple hardware
> threads. This is simply code running on a single hardware thread and all
> architectures maintain the uniprocessor illusion there.
We are talking about one CPU initializing all CPUs' portions of
dynamically allocated per-CPU memory, so there really is more than
one CPU involved.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists