[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140617215709.GA20496@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:57:09 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, lisa@...apiadmin.com,
ben@...adent.org.uk, valentina.manea.m@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Fixes function fw_download_code to check for Null
return from dev_skb_alloc
Lots of things wrong here, please step back, and slow down.
Your subject, this really isn't "v2", is it?
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:18:01PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
You aren't saying what you are doing here in the body of the patch, why
not?
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> index 11e915e..e4c8224 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_firmware.c
> @@ -62,12 +62,14 @@ static bool fw_download_code(struct net_device *dev, u8 *code_virtual_address,
>
> skb = dev_alloc_skb(frag_length + 4);
> if (!skb){
> + rt_status = false;
> + return rt_status;
> + }
Again, this patch will not apply to the tree, you are making it against
your previous patch, which was rejected. There is no way I can take
this, right?
Please start over and try again from a "clean" kernel tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists