[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJAp7OhRSHjq7hyTVbWcoq_OfnFbZ7Ud=uWzfsSNku7Zqm4x6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:32:32 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add msm8960 definitions
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:25:23AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
> In general, it all looks good. I only have 2 areas of concern. The first is a
> nit and it has to do with alternate pins for functions. There really isn't a
> need for a separate function name. That would only be required if the same pin
> had multiple functions defined for the same thing.
>
I have to blame unclear documentation here ;)
Will drop all the _[abc] suffixes.
> As for the second area of concern, there are some discrepancies between our
> internal function map and yours. This is probably due to some minor difference
> in chip rev. I'll try to find more information on this and determine if that is
> true, or if one set of documentation is incorrect.
I'll await your feedback on this; but as the documentation available
to me would be
a rewrite of what you have I suspect we'll end up with your versions.
Just ping me
when you figure this one out and I'll respin.
Thanks for the review!
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists