linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/10] mfd: cros_ec: ec_dev->cmd_xfer() returns number of bytes received from EC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140618073401.GB21030@lee--X1>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:34:01 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>, swarren@...dotorg.org,
	olof@...om.net, Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>, sjg@...omium.org,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, broonie@...nel.org,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, vpalatin@...omium.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] mfd: cros_ec: ec_dev->cmd_xfer() returns number of
 bytes received from EC

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:

> From: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>
> 
> When communicating with the EC, the cmd_xfer() function should return the
> number of bytes it received from the EC, or negative on error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c               | 2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c               | 2 +-
>  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h             | 8 ++++----
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

For the re-spin:
  Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> index dd07818..05e033c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int ec_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
>  	msg.insize = response_len;
>  
>  	result = bus->ec->cmd_xfer(bus->ec, &msg);
> -	if (result)
> +	if (result < 0)
>  		goto exit;
>  
>  	result = ec_i2c_parse_response(response, i2c_msgs, &num);
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> index 2276096..dc0ba29 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_i2c(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>  		goto done;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = 0;
> +	ret = i2c_msg[1].buf[1];
>   done:
>  	kfree(in_buf);
>  	kfree(out_buf);
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> index 4d34f1c..beba1bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>  		goto exit;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = 0;
> +	ret = len;
>  exit:
>  	mutex_unlock(&ec_spi->lock);
>  	return ret;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> index 60c0880..7b65a75 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ enum {
>   * @outdata: Outgoing data to EC
>   * @outsize: Outgoing length in bytes
>   * @indata: Where to put the incoming data from EC
> - * @insize: Incoming length in bytes (filled in by EC)
> + * @insize: Max number of bytes to accept from EC
>   * @result: EC's response to the command (separate from communication failure)
>   */
>  struct cros_ec_command {
> @@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ struct cros_ec_command {
>   * sleep at the last suspend
>   * @event_notifier: interrupt event notifier for transport devices
>   * @cmd_xfer: send command to EC and get response
> - *     Returns 0 if the communication succeeded, but that doesn't mean the EC
> - *     was happy with the command it got. Caller should check msg.result for
> - *     the EC's result code.
> + *     Returns the number of bytes received if the communication succeeded, but
> + *     that doesn't mean the EC was happy with the command. The caller
> + *     should check msg.result for the EC's result code.
>   *
>   * @priv: Private data
>   * @irq: Interrupt to use

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/