lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:37:00 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
	ch.naveen@...sung.com, t.figa@...sung.com, kgene.kim@...sung.com
CC:	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	rdunlap@...radead.org, sachin.kamat@...aro.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 4/4] ARM: dts: Fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250
 ADC

Hi Chanwoo,

On 18.06.2014 04:21, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patchset fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250 ADC. Exynos3250 SoC
> need to control only special clock for ADC. Exynos SoC except for Exynos3250
> has not included special clock for ADC. The exynos ADC driver can control
> special clock if compatible string is 'exynos3250-adc-v2'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> index 6c1fb67..107dc44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> @@ -414,10 +414,10 @@
>  		};
>  
>  		adc: adc@...C0000 {
> -			compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v3";
> +			compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-adc-v2";
>  			reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>;
>  			interrupts = <0 137 0>;
> -			clock-names = "adc", "sclk_tsadc";
> +			clock-names = "adc", "sclk_adc";

So, is it "sclk_adc" or "sclk_tsadc"? The code uses the former, while
the documentation mentions the latter. Please fix this.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists