[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403082532.9368.4.camel@debian>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:08:52 +0800
From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
To: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, minchan@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de,
hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.cz, riel@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: fix an implementation flaw in proportional
scanning
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 11:00 +0200, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> > if (!nr_file || !nr_anon)
> > break;
> >
> > - if (nr_file > nr_anon) {
> > - unsigned long scan_target =
> targets[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] +
> >
> - targets[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON]
> + 1;
> > + file_percent = nr_file * 100 / file_target;
> > + anon_percent = nr_anon * 100 / anon_target;
>
> Here it could happen.
>
>
The snippet
...
if (!nr_file || !nr_anon)
break;
...
can help us to filter the situation which you have described. It comes
from Mel's patch that is called:
mm: vmscan: use proportional scanning during direct reclaim and full
scan at DEF_PRIORITY
thx!
cyc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists