[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53A17B15.3080904@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:42:13 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Waiman.Long@...com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org
CC: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
paolo.bonzini@...il.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
riel@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
oleg@...hat.com, gleb@...hat.com, scott.norton@...com,
chegu_vinod@...com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] qspinlock: Optimize pending bit
Il 15/06/2014 14:47, Peter Zijlstra ha scritto:
> XXX: merge into the pending bit patch..
Agree, or if not move it right after the pending bit patch, before the
NR_CPUS optimization.
Paolo
> It is possible so observe the pending bit without the locked bit when
> the last owner has just released but the pending owner has not yet
> taken ownership.
>
> In this case we would normally queue -- because the pending bit is
> already taken. However, in this case the pending bit is guaranteed to
> be released 'soon', therefore wait for it and avoid queueing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists