linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5537724.LlmJ2hxcKn@wuerfel>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:57:47 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mark.brown@...aro.org,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joshi@...sung.com,
	vikas.sajjan@...sung.com, chow.kim@...sung.com,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices

On Tuesday 17 June 2014 23:26:22 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 17.06.2014 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > This seems like a reasonable way of solving the problem, but I think
> > there is an even better one that we have about in the past: if we
> > promote syscon from a platform driver into a a drivers/base/ helper
> > that is independent of the platform device matching, we can use
> > call syscon_regmap_lookup_* for any device node, whether it's already
> > bound to a driver or not, which do what you need. It would also make
> > it easier to call the syscon code before the platform_device
> > infrastructure gets initialized, which is something a number of
> > people have asked for, e.g. for using regmap to do SMP bringup
> > or for clock registration.
> 
> Basically, unless I'm missing your point, this is what my patch does,
> except that I don't move it to drivers/base/ and the registration
> function I added require a pointer to struct device. Indeed, decoupling
> it further from the driver model, by adding of_syscon_register() should
> be useful for early users.

I believe the part you are missing is that with the approach I suggested,
there would be no registration function at all. You can easily do the
lookup from the client drivers using the DT data structures, with no
need for the device at all. The only exception today is the clps711x
platform using syscon_regmap_lookup_by_pdevname(), but that should be
solved in 3.17 when clps711x becomes DT-only.

> Should I move this to drivers/base/, even though from current location
> it can be used outside the platform driver anyway?

Thinking about it some more, drivers/of might be better than drivers/base.
It depends a bit where we are heading with this, in particular if we
expect to see non-DT users in the future.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/