[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403098977.1984.111.camel@x220>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:42:57 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@...il.com>
Cc: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
List <openwrt-devel@...ts.openwrt.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Richard@...ema.h4ckr.net,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>, open@...ke-m.de,
Weinberger <richard@....at>, ath5k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Hauke@...ema.h4ckr.net, Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
"list@...ke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <list@...ke-m.de>,
Jonathan Bither <jonbither@...il.com>,
"list@...ke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
OpenWrt@...ema.h4ckr.net,
"antonynpavlov@...il.com" <antonynpavlov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH 09/28] Remove ATHEROS_AR231X
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:15 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
> Hmm, wouldn't the obvious thing than to add the driver in it's current
> form into staging? Is it well-separated from the rest of Atheros
> WLAN drivers ?
A quick glance at the code shows an include of ar231x_platform.h (which
doesn't exist) and uses of struct ar231x_board_config (ditto). So it
won't build as is and therefor needs work to qualify for staging.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists