[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403099946.32688.33.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:59:06 -0400
From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
eshelton@...ox.com, hpa@...or.com, ian.campbell@...rix.com,
jbeulich@...e.com, jeremy@...p.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
matt.fleming@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] efi: Use early_mem*() instead of early_io*()
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:17 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> Now, the only difference between early_memremap() and early_ioremap(),
> at least on x86, is PAGE_KERNEL vs. PAGE_KERNEL_IO, where PAGE_KERNEL_IO
> has the additional _PAGE_BIT_IOMAP bit set in the pte. But that's a
> software bit for x86.
I can't comment on the x86 MMU details, but using early_memremap() will
get rid of some sparse warnings in the current code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists