[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140618022731.GM8178@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:27:31 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [bisected] pre-3.16 regression on open() scalability
> OK. What would you suggest instead? If all we do is to revert the
Hang checker should have two timer phases:
Timer fires first time:
- Save context switch counter on that. Force a reschedule to some
work queue. Rearm timer
Timer fires again:
- Check reschedule count. If the reschedule count changed
it was a real hang, otherwise ignore.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists