[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201406182223.03420@pali>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:23:03 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3-n900.dts: Rename model name to "Nokia RX-51 board"
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 22:12:41 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:57:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Use same name as in legacy board code. There are lot of
> > userspace applications which using machine/model name for
> > determinating device type.
>
> Can you clarify this? Nokia kernel or userspace never had DT,
> so they cannot see e.g. /proc/device-tree/model. What other
> APIs expose model?
>
> A.
Hi Aaro,
look at email discussion about my previous patch with subject:
[PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible
Basically that patch export model name in Hardware /proc/cpuinfo
instead generic DT name. And this patch change name to what
legacy board code reported.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists