linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: filter: fix upper BPF instruction limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:43:28 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: filter: fix upper BPF instruction limit

On 06/19/2014 12:34 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> The original checks (via sk_chk_filter) for instruction count uses ">",
> not ">=", so changing this in sk_convert_filter has the potential to break
> existing seccomp filters that used exactly BPF_MAXINSNS many instructions.
>
> Fixes: bd4cf0ed331a ("net: filter: rework/optimize internal BPF interpreter's instruction set")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/