linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] mfd: cros_ec: cleanup: remove unused fields from struct cros_ec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Xa2pb6cFSbHoXAaS8LXdVO-uv+RCXMs2HmobgutSrNwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:30:17 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	lk <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mfd: cros_ec: cleanup: remove unused fields from
 struct cros_ec_device

Simon,

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org> wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On 17 June 2014 21:22, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>>
>> Simon,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Doug,
>> >
>> > On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>> >> From: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>
>> >>
>> >> struct cros_ec_device has a superfluous "name" field. We can get all the
>> >> debugging info we need from the existing ec_name and phys_name fields, so
>> >> let's take out the extra field.
>> >
>> > Except that it no longer prints I2C/SPI - i.e. the transport that is
>> > used. Is that not considered important?
>>
>> Before this change:
>>   [    1.895472] cros-ec-spi spi2.0: Chrome EC (SPI)
>>
>> After this change:
>>   [    1.910671] cros-ec-spi spi2.0: Chrome EC device registered
>>
>>
>> I think having SPI in the name twice is probably enough.  ;)
>
> Ah that helps! Could have been in the commit message.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>

If I re-spin the series I'll add it.  I think the new message was in
the original commit in the "TEST=" clause and I left it out.  I
probably should have added it in with the proper wording...

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/