[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140619051300.GF22053@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:43:00 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>, jeeja.kp@...el.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, davej@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dongxing.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: compress: Fix the mismatch size of struc between
share lib(32bit) and kernel(64bit)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:48:59PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2014, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > Anyway, if you use the __packed attribute, best apply it only to
> > > the individual __u64 member(s), not the entire struct, otherwise
> > > you might change user space programs in a subtle way when the alignment
> > > changes from 4 to 1 byte.
> >
> > then wouldn't it make sense to call out the aligned as well to ensure that it is
> > aligning to what we want. Then we should add aligned (4) everywhere as mostly we
> > need 4 byte aligned here
>
> If you want to be explicit, then just mark the entire structure as
> attribute((packed,aligned(4))), not each individual member.
Oh yes, thats the idea. I will send out and also while reviewing found that
packed was missing for few of other structs, so lets fix it now before 64bits
systems proliferate and cause havoc :)
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists