[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140619062824.GB22025@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:28:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/10] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound
violation information
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 01:13:48AM +0000, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> On 2014-06-18, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:44:13PM +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> >
> > This whole insn decoding machinery above looks like adapted from
> > arch/x86/lib/insn.c. You should merge it with the generic code in
> > insn.c instead of homegrowing it here only for the purposes of MPX.
> > And if it doesn't work for your needs, you should should extend the
> > generic code to do so.
> Petkov, as we discussed on initial version of this patchset, general
> insn framework didn't work out well and I have tried to use generic
> struct insn, insn_field, etc. for obvious benefits.
Let me repeat myself: "And if it doesn't work for your needs, you should
extend the generic code to do so."
We don't do homegrown almost-copies of generic code.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists