lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:10:16 +0530
From:	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
CC:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, sparse@...isli.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com, akataria@...are.com,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	rdunlap@...radead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dl9pf@....de, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist"
 error on ia64 and ppc64

On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>>>> Ping?
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it?
>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h
>>>>>> index bfb6ded..8b89d65 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h
>>>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,17 @@ typedef struct {
>>>>>>  	unsigned long env;
>>>>>>  } func_descr_t;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && (!defined(_CALL_ELF) || _CALL_ELF == 1)
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * On PPC64 ABIv1 the function pointer actually points to the
>>>>>> + * function's descriptor. The first entry in the descriptor is the
>>>>>> + * address of the function text.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +#define function_entry(fn)	(((func_descr_t *)(fn))->entry)
>>>>>> +#else
>>>>>> +#define function_entry(fn)	((unsigned long)(fn))
>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>
>>>> We already have ppc_function_entry(), can't you use that?
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask you whether the address which ppc_function_entry() returns on
>>> PPC ABIv2 is really same address in kallsyms or not.
>>> As you can see, kprobes uses function_entry() to get the actual entry address
>>> where kallsyms knows. I have not much information about that, but it seems that
>>> the "global entry point" is the address which kallsyms knows, isn't it?
>>
>> OK. I'm not sure off the top of my head which address kallsyms knows about, but
>> yes it's likely that it is the global entry point.
>>
>> I recently sent a patch to add ppc_global_function_entry(), because we need it
>> in the ftrace code. Once that is merged you could use that.
> 
> Yeah, I could use that. But since this is used in arch-independent code (e.g. IA64
> needs similar macro), I think we'd better define function_entry() in asm/types.h for
> general use (for kallsyms), and rename ppc_function_entry to local_function_entry()
> in asm/code-patching.h.
> 
> 
>> How do you hit the original problem, you don't actually specify in your commit
>> message? Something with kprobes obviously, but what exactly? I'll try and
>> reproduce it here.
> 
> Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't work,
> because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe blacklist.
> So, reproducing it is just enabling CONFIG_KPROBES and boot it.
Well,  we don't get those messages on Power, since the kallsyms has the
entries for ".function_name". The correct way to verify is, either  :

1) Dump the black_list via xmon ( see :
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/29/893 ) and verify the entries.

or

2) Issue a kprobe on a black listed entry and hit a success,(which we
will, since we don't check the actual function address).

Thanks
Suzuki


> 
> Thank you,
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists