[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53A2C28F.1080007@st.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:59:27 +0200
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
To: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...inux.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 4/7] ARM: stih416-b2020e: Enable PWM
on the B2020 Rev-E
Hi Peter,
On 06/19/2014 12:12 PM, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
>>> Why are you only enabling this for rev-E board?
>>
>> Purely for testing purposes, as it's the only board I have. If
>> anyone has the other revisions and would be happy to test the driver
>> for me then great.
>
> Ok that's what I suspected.
>
> If you tell me how, I can test on a Rev C board. But as there are several other
> revisions I think checking the board schematics would be the quickest way forward.
Only Rev C & E are in the wild now, so checking these two boards will
be enough.
Thanks,
Maxime
>
>>> If you make the stih415 DT PWM nodes part of this series as well, then
>>> assuming there is no good reason to the contary, the PWM could
>>> be enabled for both stih415/6 in the common stih41x-b2020 DTS file which
>>> is also included by rev-E (assuming that PWM wiring is not some rev-E specific
>>> thing).
>
> Can you add the stih415 bindings in V2 as well?
>
> regards,
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel mailing list
> Kernel@...inux.com
> http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists