lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:04:32 +0800
From:	Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	minchan@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de, hannes@...xchg.org,
	mhocko@...e.cz, riel@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: fix an implementation flaw in proportional
 scanning

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:55:02 +0800 Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index a8ffe4e..2c35e34 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -2087,8 +2086,8 @@ static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
> >  	blk_start_plug(&plug);
> >  	while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
> >  					nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) {
> > -		unsigned long nr_anon, nr_file, percentage;
> > -		unsigned long nr_scanned;
> > +		unsigned long nr_anon, nr_file, file_percent, anon_percent;
> > +		unsigned long nr_to_scan, nr_scanned, percentage;
> >  
> >  		for_each_evictable_lru(lru) {
> >  			if (nr[lru]) {
> 
> The increased stack use is a slight concern - we can be very deep here.
> I suspect the "percent" locals are more for convenience/clarity, and
> they could be eliminated (in a separate patch) at some cost of clarity?
> 
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a8ffe4e..2c35e34 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2057,8 +2057,7 @@ out:
 static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control
*sc)
 {
        unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
-       unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
-       unsigned long nr_to_scan;
+       unsigned long file_target, anon_target;

>From the above snippet, we can know that the "percent" locals come from
targets[NR_LRU_LISTS]. So this fix does not increase the stack.

thx!
cyc


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists