lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:52:23 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/24] ARM64:ILP32: COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME is true for
 ILP32 tasks.

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:02:09AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Since __kernel_long_t (time_t) is long long, we need to tell the rest
> of kernel that we use 64bit time_t for compat when the task is not an
> AARCH32 task.  The reason why we check AARCH32 rather than ILP32 here
> is because if we don't have AARCH32 compiled in (which is going to be
> the common case due to AARCH32 requiring 4k pages).
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> index 85f945c..c77fc0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ struct compat_timeval {
>  	s32		tv_usec;
>  };
>  
> +/* ILP32 uses 64bit time_t and not the above compat structures */
> +#define COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME !is_a32_compat_task()

Brackets.

BTW, you could write is_ilp32_compat_task().

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists