[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1406190925430.2785@gentwo.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:29:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: percpu: micro-optimize round-to-even
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:02:29PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This change shaves a few bytes off the generated code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> > ---
> > mm/percpu.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
> > index 2ddf9a9..978097f 100644
> > --- a/mm/percpu.c
> > +++ b/mm/percpu.c
> > @@ -720,8 +720,7 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved)
> > if (unlikely(align < 2))
> > align = 2;
> >
> > - if (unlikely(size & 1))
> > - size++;
> > + size += size & 1;
>
> I'm not gonna apply this. This isn't that hot a path. It's not
> worthwhile to micro optimize code like this.
Dont we have an ALIGN() macro for this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists