linux-kernel - mmu_notifier and i915_gem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:36:55 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: mmu_notifier and i915_gem_userptr.c

Hey Chris,

recently I had a look at i915_gem_userptr.c in order to extend the
mmu_notifier call-backs implemented there. My goal is to implement the
change_pte call-back where it is necessary to get rid of it being
wrapped mn_invalidate_range_start/end() calls (for the reason see
commit 6bdb913f).

For most users of mmu_notifiers this is easy, except the i915 driver :)
The invalidate_range_start notifier implemented there can sleep, so it
can't be reused for a change_pte implementation (because change_pte is
called under ptl spin_lock and is not allowed to sleep). On the other
hand you also didn't implement the invalidate_page notifier, so I am not
sure whether the code actually cares about the somewhat similar
change_pte events?

Here is where change_pte is called from:

	* In KSM code when pages are merged (shouldn't be relevant
	  because KSM doesn't merged pages returned by get_user_pages())
	* In uprobes code when a user-page is replaced by a kernel page
	  (should only handle .text sections, so probaly not relevant
	   here)
	* When someone writes to a COW page in mm/memory.c (this looks
	  relevant looking at forked processes, on the other hand,
	  this is currently handled by unbinding the vma from the
	  object list in the i915 driver)

I am not familiar with the i915 hardware and the driver implementation
details, so I wanted to ask whether the driver

	1) Cares about the change_pte event?
	2) If it cares, what is the best way to implement it? What the
	   invalidate_range_start() notifier does seems a bit overkill,
	   since for the change_pte event nothing is unmapped (but maybe
	   remapped)

So any insight you could provide here would be useful :)

Thanks,

	Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/