[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53A30EDA.7050407@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:24:58 +0200
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: Fix missing binding documentation for Armada
38x
Hi Rob,
On 19/06/2014 16:54, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Gregory CLEMENT
> <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>> For the Armada 380 and Armada 385 SoCs, the common bindings for those
>> 2 SoCs, was forgotten. This patch add the documentation for the
>> marvell,aramda38x property.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> This fix should be merged in 3.16. For 3.15 I am not sure as it is not
>> a regression.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gregory
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt
>> index 11f2330a6554..b68bcb80d2de 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/armada-38x.txt
>> @@ -6,5 +6,9 @@ following property:
>>
>> Required root node property:
>>
>> +compatible: must contain "marvell,armada38x"
>> +
>> +Required root node property:
>> +
>> - compatible: must contain either "marvell,armada380" or
>> "marvell,armada385" depending on the variant of the SoC being used.
>
> This looks a bit strange. How about something like this:
>
> - compatible: must contain either "marvell,armada380" or
> "marvell,armada385" depending on the variant of the SoC being
> used and contain "marvell,armada38x".
Indeed it will be more clear written in this way.
Thanks,
Gregory
>
> Rob
>
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists