[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18713609.X6uzY7R5jD@sifl>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:59:04 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selinux: simple cleanup for cond_read_node()
On Thursday, June 19, 2014 08:58:31 AM Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -402,19 +402,14 @@ static int cond_read_node(struct policydb *p,
> > > struct
> >>
> >> cond_node *node, void *fp) int rc;
> >>
> >> struct cond_expr *expr = NULL, *last = NULL;
> >>
> >> - rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(u32));
> >> + rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(buf));
> >
> > This is a bit nit-picky, but how about using "sizeof(u32) * 2"? It is
> > more
> > consistent with the rest of the function and helps underscore that we are
> > reading two 32-bit values.
> >
> > Assuming you're okay with the change I can fix it up when I apply the
> > patch.
>
> I'm okay with it. :)
Great, both patches are applied.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists