lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:19:54 -0700
From:	josh@...htriplett.org
To:	Johannes Stadlinger <Johannes.Stadlinger@....de>
Cc:	devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	Maximilian Eschenbacher <maximilian@...henbacher.email>,
	linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Tugce Sirin <ztugcesirin@...il.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <superna9999@...il.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Vitaly Osipov <vitaly.osipov@...il.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] wlan-ng/prism2sta:checkpatch: Fix long lines

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:20:18PM +0200, Johannes Stadlinger wrote:
> This patch fixes all warning of checkpatch about lines over 80
> characters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stadlinger <Johannes.Stadlinger@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Eschenbacher <maximilian@...henbacher.email>
> CC: linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de
> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> CC: Tugce Sirin <ztugcesirin@...il.com>
> CC: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> CC: Neil Armstrong <superna9999@...il.com>
> CC: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> CC: Vitaly Osipov <vitaly.osipov@...il.com>
> CC: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org

Most of these look fine, but...

> @@ -1271,7 +1275,8 @@ void prism2sta_processing_defer(struct work_struct *data)
>  				     HFA384x_RID_CURRENTSSID, result);
>  				return;
>  			}
> -			prism2mgmt_bytestr2pstr((struct hfa384x_bytestr *) &ssid,
> +			prism2mgmt_bytestr2pstr((struct hfa384x_bytestr *)
> +									&ssid,
>  						(p80211pstrd_t *) &
>  						wlandev->ssid);

...that (and the one in the subsequent context lines) looks horrible.
I'd suggest breaking after the opening parenthesis of the function call
and just indenting the arguments by one tab:
	foo_with_long_name(
		long_arg,
		another_long_arg);

Better yet, ignore checkpatch and format that call more readably as
though the 80 column rule didn't exist.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists