lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:07:32 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <>, Andi Kleen <>,
	Dave Hansen <>,
	LKML <>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <>
Subject: Re: [bisected] pre-3.16 regression on open() scalability

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 02:32:03PM -0700, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 04:16:34PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > This looks very much like the CONFIG_PREEMPT problem in not so
> > extreme form. Maybe we need to add another config option:
> > 
> > 
> > to get the fastest code possible and those cond_rescheds removed from the
> > critical paths?
> > 
> > Or better
> > 
> > 
> > to enable those cond_rescheds.
> That much actually does seem quite reasonable: making cond_resched() do
> non-trivial work ought to have a config option to disable it.

I am putting together patches based on Eric Dumazet's suggestion and on a
variant of the above approach.  However, I do expect the distros to starve
to death between those two bales of hay.  But perhaps the actual patches
will inspire a bit of light to go with this thread's heat and smoke.

							Thanx, Paul

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists