[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3283A5E3@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:42:56 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Liu hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>,
"anton@...msg.org" <anton@...msg.org>,
"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
"peifeiyue@...wei.com" <peifeiyue@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: Should Pstore(ramoops) records customized information?
> BTW, I note that "extern struct pstore_info *psinfo" locates in
> fs/pstore/internal.h. So users out of directory "fs/pstore/" can not use pstore to
> record messages. We do not want other kernel users to use pstore, right? And can we
> break this?
Yes we can make some interface visible to the rest of the kernel ... probably
not the raw "*psinfo" though. Perhaps the pstore_alloc_ring_buffer() and
pstore_write_ring_buffer() functions should be the ones exported to the
rest of the kernel.
> ditoo.. Since other backends like efi and erst may can not privide such ring buffer.
> So pstore_alloc_ring_buffer should be a funciton pointer of pstore_info struct.
Yes - that allows less capable backend like ERST and efivars to not provide the
service. Since it becomes internal, you can drop the "pstore_" prefix. E.g.
something like:
int pstore_alloc_ring_buffer(char *name, int size)
{
return psinfo->alloc_ring_buffer(name, size);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pstore_alloc_ring_buffer);
... and you have to find/make some global header for the "extern" declaration.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists