linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] arm64: add the ability to hook the fault code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9034CBD80F070943B59700D7F8149ED90182148D14@SC-VEXCH4.marvell.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 02:02:26 -0700
From:	Neil Zhang <zhangwm@...vell.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm64: add the ability to hook the fault code


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.deacon@....com]
> Sent: 2014年6月20日 16:40
> To: Neil Zhang
> Cc: Catalin Marinas; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: add the ability to hook the fault code
> 
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:33:59AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.deacon@....com]
> > > Sent: 2014年6月20日 16:26
> > > To: Neil Zhang
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: add the ability to hook the fault code
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:54:56AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > > > Add the ability to hook the fault code for future use.
> > >
> > > Do you have a user for this in the kernel tree? I'd rather add the
> > > hook with the first user, if it doesn't exist already.
> > >
> >
> > Marvell Soc has a feature to use the external abort.
> > I didn't submit it since it's a private feature.
> 
> In which case, let's wait until we have a user of this in the mainline tree.
> 

OK！

> Will

Best Regards,
Neil Zhang