lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140620093340.GL25104@arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:33:40 +0100
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	David Riley <davidriley@...omium.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Ritesh Harjain <ritesh.harjani@...il.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/5] lib/genalloc.c: Add power aligned algorithm

Hi Laura,

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:39:21AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> One of the more common algorithms used for allocation
> is to align the start address of the allocation to
> the order of size requested. Add this as an algorithm
> option for genalloc.

Good idea, I didn't know this even existed!

> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/genalloc.h |  4 ++++
>  lib/genalloc.c           | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/genalloc.h b/include/linux/genalloc.h
> index 1c2fdaa..3cd0934 100644
> --- a/include/linux/genalloc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/genalloc.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ extern void gen_pool_set_algo(struct gen_pool *pool, genpool_algo_t algo,
>  extern unsigned long gen_pool_first_fit(unsigned long *map, unsigned long size,
>  		unsigned long start, unsigned int nr, void *data);
>  
> +extern unsigned long gen_pool_first_fit_order_align(unsigned long *map,
> +		unsigned long size, unsigned long start, unsigned int nr,
> +		void *data);
> +
>  extern unsigned long gen_pool_best_fit(unsigned long *map, unsigned long size,
>  		unsigned long start, unsigned int nr, void *data);
>  
> diff --git a/lib/genalloc.c b/lib/genalloc.c
> index bdb9a45..9758529 100644
> --- a/lib/genalloc.c
> +++ b/lib/genalloc.c
> @@ -481,6 +481,27 @@ unsigned long gen_pool_first_fit(unsigned long *map, unsigned long size,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(gen_pool_first_fit);
>  
>  /**
> + * gen_pool_first_fit_order_align - find the first available region
> + * of memory matching the size requirement. The region will be aligned
> + * to the order of the size specified.
> + * @map: The address to base the search on
> + * @size: The bitmap size in bits
> + * @start: The bitnumber to start searching at
> + * @nr: The number of zeroed bits we're looking for
> + * @data: additional data - unused

It doesn't look unused to me.

> + */
> +unsigned long gen_pool_first_fit_order_align(unsigned long *map,
> +		unsigned long size, unsigned long start,
> +		unsigned int nr, void *data)
> +{
> +	unsigned long order = (unsigned long) data;
> +	unsigned long align_mask = (1 << get_order(nr << order)) - 1;

Why isn't the order just order?

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ