linux-kernel - Re: Change gpio-reulator-probe() to use managed resources.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140620102037.GV5099@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:20:37 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Rob Jones <rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...ethink.co.uk, ian.molton@...ethink.co.uk,
	ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk, heiko@...ech.de
Subject: Re: Change gpio-reulator-probe() to use managed resources.

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:38:29AM +0100, Rob Jones wrote:

> I omitted to put "[Patch 0/4][v2]" on the front of the subject line.The
> actual patches followed.

Oh, so this is associated with a patch series?

> It was a consequence of lack of familiarity with the tools; I'm learning, so
> it shouldn't happen again. Would you like me to resubmit?

I do see another patch from you for the regulator subsystem which is
part of a series so I guess no need.

Please, if you are resubmitting try to use a changelog style consistent
with the code you're submitting against - you've got subject lines with
"drivers/" which the kernel doesn't do.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)