[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1406200925360.10271@gentwo.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:29:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>, ryabinin.a.a@...il.com,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: SLUB_DEBUG=n: use the same alloc/free hooks
as for SLUB_DEBUG=y
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (Is that a nack?)
Not sure.
> The intent seems to have been implemented strangely. Perhaps it would
> be clearer and more conventional to express all this using Kconfig
> logic.
Well it really does not work right since SLUB_DEBUG=y is the default
config and this behavior would be a bit surprising.
> Anyway, if we plan to leave the code as-is then can we please get a
> comment in there so the next person is not similarly confused?
Ok. Lets apply the patch.
Gosh. I think we need some way to figure out if code is being added to the
critical paths. I had no idea about that latest issue where might_sleep
suddenly became a call to cond_resched() until I saw the bug report.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists