lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:22:43 -0400
From:	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: restrict the use of recursive read_lock with qrwlock

Unlike the original unfair rwlock implementation, queued rwlock
will grant lock according to the chronological sequence of the lock
requests except when the lock requester is in the interrupt context.
As a result, recursive read_lock calls will hang the process if there
is a write_lock call somewhere in between the read_lock calls.

This patch updates the lockdep implementation to look for recursive
read_lock calls when queued rwlock is being used.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index d24e433..b6c9f2e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1766,12 +1766,22 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
 		if (hlock_class(prev) != hlock_class(next))
 			continue;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUE_RWLOCK
+		/*
+		 * Queue rwlock only allows read-after-read recursion of the
+		 * same lock class when the latter read is in an interrupt
+		 * context.
+		 */
+		if ((read == 2) && prev->read && in_interrupt())
+			return 2;
+#else
 		/*
 		 * Allow read-after-read recursion of the same
 		 * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
 		 */
 		if ((read == 2) && prev->read)
 			return 2;
+#endif
 
 		/*
 		 * We're holding the nest_lock, which serializes this lock's
@@ -1852,8 +1862,10 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
 	 * write-lock never takes any other locks, then the reads are
 	 * equivalent to a NOP.
 	 */
+#ifndef CONFIG_QUEUE_RWLOCK
 	if (next->read == 2 || prev->read == 2)
 		return 1;
+#endif
 	/*
 	 * Is the <prev> -> <next> dependency already present?
 	 *
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ