[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140620163023.GE4904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:30:23 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [bisected] pre-3.16 regression on open() scalability
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:07:13AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > And the fraction of the small systems that care that much about latency
> > is also quite small.
>
> This also impacts general performance of course not only latency.
>
> > Of course, if you have performance results that show otherwise, please
> > share them.
>
> We are discussing a performance problem right here.
We are engaging in a lot of -speculation- about an -alleged- performance
problem. I have posted a fix to the actual performance problem, but the
guy reporting the original report of that problem has not yet reported
the performance of the fix. Which is fine, as I am getting ready to
post an updated fix, and besides which he might well have higher-priority
tasks requiring his attention. But without that performance information,
we are all just engaging in baseless speculation.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists